Victoria is a
very, very good film about people who make very, very poor decisions. And
that’s okay. Really, it’s okay to watch a movie about people who spend 138
minutes of their lives making bad choices. Faulty character choices isn’t
necessarily faulty filmmaking. In the best hands, such choices are realistic
depictions of people with particular flaws. The titular character in Victoria, played harrowingly by Laia
Costa, makes a lot of choices throughout the film that you may not agree with.
In fact, I let out an “Ohh, nooo” early in the movie, partly because I thought
Victoria was acting stupidly, but mostly because I really cared about her and didn’t want her to get hurt. And that’s
the difference. That’s the character balance good films know how to achieve.
They make you care about someone, as
opposed to making them knife bait to setup the next kill.
After I got to know and care about Victoria, I completely believed
that she was naïve enough to let her drunken curiosity motivate her lack of judgment.
So that’s my counter to the mild criticism facing Victoria; backlash you may not have even heard about, if you’ve
heard of the film at all. If you have
heard of Victoria, it’s likely for
one very substantial reason: the film is 138 minutes long and was shot in one
unbroken continuous take.
To repeat for emphasis: the entirety of Victoria takes place in one unbroken shot. No special effects, no quick
pans to mask hidden editing cuts (the Birdman
method), no gimmicks, no tricks – really, the entire fucking movie is one shot.
It’s a 138 minute story shot and told in real time. Real time in which we watch
a young woman and her new friends enjoy a drunken night in Berlin, until that
night turns into a nightmare.
On April 27, 2014, German filmmaker Sebastian Schipper and
his astounding cinematographer (who gets lead billing in the film’s closing
credits), Sturla Brandth Grøvlen, used the hours between 4 a.m. and 7 a.m. to
shoot Victoria in a few square blocks of Berlin. They had
tried and succeed twice before, but Schipper wasn’t pleased with the results.
The first take of Victoria was too cautious,
and the second was too frantic. The third attempt, which, again, is the entire fucking film, is what we see on
screen. And what we see on screen is pure brilliance.
It would be so easy for a movie executed like Victoria to stay calm. Long periods of
time could go by where the camera simply sits in the corner and captures an
extended conversation. Thankfully, that’s not the case here. Grøvlen’s camera
goes up tiny attic steps and rests on elevators, it runs in the streets and
dances in clubs. It assumes Costa’s point of view and tracks her in glorious close-up.
It gets in the back seat of cars, hides in dangerous stairways, and on and on
and on. The camera in Victoria
doesn’t know how to slow down, which keeps the story moving and evolving. Sure,
there are lengthy conversations in the movie, but because Victoria has been
marketed as a thriller, the laws of film tell us that at some point, things
will begin to go wrong. Which they do, to thrilling results.
The stateside release of Victoria
is a bit upsetting. The film barely got a push in major cities, and remains
unseen in smaller markets. News recently dropped that it lost out as Germany’s
official submission for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film, which
means it’s unlikely that Victoria
will get a fresh theatrical push come awards time. Damn shame. Victoria should be considered for, and
win, every possible award for cinematography this year, but moreover, this is a
film worth seeing because of its story, and the lead character running amok in
it.
To be clear. The technical aspects of Victoria are literally jaw-dropping; I will be studying this film
for years and years. (And it’s not just the cinematography, Nils Frahm’s music,
accompanied by some DJ Koze tracks, is close to being the best score of the
year.) But technicality only gets you so far. To be good, to mean something, to
matter, you have to tell a good
story. Victoria tells one, thanks
much in part to its fearless lead character. Laia Costa, who I’ve never seen
before, leaves everything on the screen. Her naïveté and playfulness, her dread
and overwhelming fear – it’s all there. She’s a warrior, a force, she is… Victoria. And that’s what matters most. A
You May Also Like
OK, I am definitely adding this to my ever-expanding watchlist.
ReplyDeleteYou'll love it.
DeleteThis sounds interesting. I'll give it a shot. Sometimes it's hard for me to enjoy movies where people continue to make really poor choices, that was my main issue with Laggies, for example. I just couldn't understand why the main character was doing the things she did. But technically speaking, I'm very intrigued after your review.
ReplyDeleteI don't think every flick should be given a pass for characters making bad decisions (I had issues with Laggies in that regard as well), but if the film is strong enough, I can dig it.
DeleteGreat review! This looks very interesting and what you wrote about that one take got me very curious, I'm definitely gonna check it out if I ever have a chance
ReplyDeleteThanks! I hope you like it! It's such a marvel of a film.
DeleteWow. I'll be back to finish reading this review after I've seen the movie.
ReplyDeleteSounds good!
DeleteI watched "Victoria" a few days ago and...well, wow! What an astounding piece of cinema. Like you, I let out an "Oh, no!" early on. While I couldn't get on board with Victoria's decisions, she drew me in. And I haven't been able to shake her off since.
ReplyDeleteSame here! She really gets under your skin in the best possible way. So glad you liked the film. Thanks for the comment!
DeleteI had never heard of this before, but now i really want to see it. An entire 138 minute movie that is just one shot? Now that is impressive. Just that alone makes me want to check it out, but the rest of the movie sounds great too.
ReplyDeleteYeah man, it's insane. No tricks or anything, just a lot of audacity. It's such a thrill to watch.
DeleteExcellent review! I knew it looked like a single take, but I didn't know it actually was one. That's insane, and only reinforces my admiration for the film. Costa's performance is more incredible based on that knowledge as well. It's a shame this has been ignored pretty much everywhere on the awards circuit. It's probably a lock for a couple of CinSpec noms, though. ;)
ReplyDeleteCinSpecs to the rescue! It's just a shame that smaller films have a much harder time generating awards buzz. I mean, the fact that this hasn't been nominated for cinematography for any major award is criminal.
Delete