The film centers on Christian (Deen), a trust fund baby dabbling
in the world of independent film production, and his girlfriend Tara (Lohan),
who lives off the fat of the land. In the film’s opening scene, Tara and
Christian dine with another couple, Gina (Amanda Brooks), Christian’s assistant
and the director of the latest flick he’s producing, and Ryan (Nolan Funk), the
freshly cast lead in Gina and Christian’s film.
Throughout The Canyons,
we watch these four roll into and out of each other’s lives over the course of
a few days. We learn of a previous, hidden relationship between Tara and Ryan.
We learn of Christian’s obsessive jealousy. We watch Tara and Christian
frequently fuck people they’ve met online, for no other reason than Why Not. We
watch and learn many things, all with exceedingly less interest. As the story
developed, I became increasing unconcerned in what was happening or why. Blame
the script, the actors, or the director (or all three); for whatever reason, The Canyons is never fully engaging.
Naturalism is the vibe here. That’s what every performer in The Canyons is trying to achieve. Truth.
Reality. A lacking showmanship. Acting without acting. With the exception of Amanda Brooks (who is genuinely
fantastic throughout), and Nolan Funk (who is inarguably awful throughout),
every actor in this film delivers a wildly uneven performance. All achieve
rare, strong moments that are drowned out by laughable acting choices.
I’m one of those people who want Lindsay Lohan to succeed.
With every new performance, I hope that this
will be her chance to excel. If she had a shot at a comeback, The Canyons surely was it. Sadly, I’m
forced to label it as a general misfire. Twice toward the end of the film, Tara
is confronted by Christian, once with physical viciousness, the other with
emotional intimidation. Lohan nails these scenes. She presents a scared
shitless little girl void of direction and choice. And rather than harping on
all of the things Lohan gets wrong as Tara, it’s kindest to say that these are
two brief scenes she gets absolutely right.
As written, James Deen’s Christian is a quintessential Bret
Easton Ellis character. Morose, insipid, selfish – a despicably entitled,
carelessly wealthy Alpha male. Christian has all the makings of an exceptional
Ellis character – the Patrick and Sean Bateman’s, the Clay and Julian’s, the
Victor Ward’s, and so on. Problem is, James Deen is no Christian Bale. Hell,
he’s not even James Van Der Beek. He’s a guy playing it cool who is so
obviously playing it cool. Deen’s work is purposefully unflashy, restrained to
a fault. His moments of conflicted silence, however, are flawless. Deen is in
command of a menacing gaze that forced me to think, “Oh, wow, where has this guy been?” Delivery of dialogue and
subtlety of movement is where he fails. His words are too stilted. His mannerisms
are too theatrical. He delivers the simple, dismissive put down of, “Is this
guy for real?” with the poise of a frat boy, and executes the act of zipping up
a hoodie with the grace of a, well, porn star.
A few hints of redemption. Cinematographer John DeFazio does
digital wonders with his Alexa Pro camera, making The Canyons look like it’s far more than a quarter million dollar
picture. Brendan Canning’s music (with help from Me&John and a handful of
electronica artists) is mostly on point as well. Eerie, leading, but never
forced. And, as mentioned, Amanda Brooks deserves to stand out among the rest
of the cast. She’s a star.
Perhaps my expectations for The Canyons were unreasonable. Perhaps my appreciation for Ellis’
novels and Schrader’s films blinded my judgment. With a movie as high profiled
as The Canyons, everyone was bound to
form an opinion before we had all of the context. And now here I sit, context
fully discovered, opinion fully realized. I sit here as a self admitted fan who
was ultimately let down. I give Schrader, Ellis, Lohan and Deen endless credit
for trying something wholly different, and promoting it so boldly. Although The Canyons is a failed experiment, if
Schrader, Ellis and Pope announced tomorrow that they were beginning
pre-production on an entirely new project, you can bet I would be eagerly
rooting for it to succeed. D
Well this is certainly a let down. I will be seeing this in the next few days and was excited to see this for Gus Van Sant (is he any good?) but hearing that almost every other performance is wooden and artificial in the worst way is disappointing. The few clips I watched online (seems like months ago) of a scene with Deen and Lohan didn't seem promising but hope still remained. This review has dried up whatever there was left.
ReplyDeleteVery well constructed review regardless of the film's quality though!
Ha, thanks man! Okay, first off, that clip of Deen and Lohan that you're talking about (the one where he pushes her around and screams at her) is arguably the best acted scene of the film. So basically, the movie doesn't get stronger than that.
DeleteVan Sant is good... for the 2 minutes he's on screen :\
Well, I just finished watching it and it wasn't as terrible as I thought it would be (though that isn't exactly saying much). You were correct, the cinematography was the highlight of the entire thing and it doesn't look like it was shot for the budget it was. Deen wasn't as bad as I thought either, he was passable, I guess; but as you said Amanda Brooks was the best one in here.
DeleteHopefully Ellis' team up with Gaspar Noe will produce better results.
I'm glad you were able to appreciate certain aspects of it, namely the look of the film and Brooks' performance. I've heard rumors of Ellis and Noe working together, but man, if that is true, how cool could that be?
DeleteGreat review. I've been curious about this since the trailer was released, but I wasn't expecting much. Can't wait to see it for Amanda Brooks' performance, though.
ReplyDeleteThanks man. Yeah, it would be wise to not expect too much, but maybe you'll have fun with it. Brooks is definitely solid. She saved me from totally panning the flick.
DeleteI never like to root against someone like Paul Schrader but the fact that he compared Lindsay Lohan to Marilyn Monroe made me lose some respect for him. Lohan is no Marilyn Monroe. Not in acting skills, charm, or notoriety. Plus, I've kind of had it with Lohan and her bullshit antics as she's just some spoiled, washed-up starlet who should be in prison right now for all of her crap and serve 7 years so we wouldn't have to hear from her for a while as well as those claims that it wasn't her fault.
ReplyDeleteYeah that really was a bizarre claim. Schrader is obviously someone who speaks his mind, but that Monroe comparison threw me for a loop. I wanted Lohan to shine here, sadly... no.
Deletehttp://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/13/magazine/here-is-what-happens-when-you-cast-lindsay-lohan-in-your-movie.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0&_r=0
ReplyDeleteIn-depth article about the making of this film, thought it might interest you. Whole thing was an absolute sham, brought out the worst in every one of its participants. Looks like the end result wasn't worth it either.
I've read that piece. It's fucking entertaining. I love those behind-the-scenes stories. I wish the books about the making of Heaven's Gate, Brazil, and Bonfire of the Vanities are still available. I would love to read those books.
DeleteI suggest Conquest of the Useless, by Werner Herzog. It's a compilation of his diaries during the making of Fitzcarraldo.
DeleteI actually linked that article in my review. Interesting read indeed. In addition to Conquest of the Useless, My Best Fiend is basically a documentary dedicated to the Herzog/Kinski feud. Great flick.
DeleteI actually really liked the film, although it's cold indeed. It's just so...modern. Weird. Your review touches on most of the reasons why I can see someone might not like it. I wrote my own one here, which seemed to come out as an massive diatribe against the people whose criticisms I think are somewhat unfounded;
ReplyDeletehttp://adventuresofasuburbanstreetposse.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/film-review-canyons-paul-schrader-2013.html
Nolan Funk is pretty shit, isn't he? I remember one scene where he's walking along swinging his shoulders in these huge movements and it just looks fucking ridiculous.
I liked your review a lot. And I agree with you, I think most people considered the film DOA once Deen and Lohan were cast, and that does indeed make for an unfounded review. Glad we agree than Funk was shit though.
DeleteWhat I don't understand is why Lindsay's team keep getting her to do these 'dramatic' films when she's a comedy actress. If you look at her earlier stuff (Mean Girls, Freaky Friday, Parent Trap), it's all comedy and that's where she shines most. She's got great comedic timing (well, in my opinion) and she should therefore start looking at comedy scripts instead.
ReplyDeleteIt is odd that she has seemingly abandoned the genre that made her. I appreciate that she wanted to shift her career to be "taken seriously" but it obviously isn't fully working. I don't know if she'll ever outlive her infamy.
DeleteThere are plenty of ideas that Ellis' screenplay likes to toy around with, but never do anything with. It only preaches to us as if he and Schrader had nowhere else to bitch about the current-state of cinemas, and decided to take up an-hour-and-a-half of our lives to do so. I didn't hate it, but it did feel a bit ugly, and not in the way they were going for either. Good review Alex.
ReplyDeleteI did appreciate their intentions, but yeah, the final result left me completely bored. I didn't fully hate it either, but I doubt I'll ever have a reason to watch it again.
DeleteThings don't work out, sometimes fantastically, but I commend you for not letting that dampen your enthusiasm for those involved.
ReplyDeleteI'm not particularly rooting for (or against) any one - not sure if that will enhance or detract from the experience. We'll see...
Oh I'll always love Schrader and Ellis, no doubt. A worthy experiment, but definitely a failed one in my eyes. I'm curious to hear your take.
DeleteAwesome read Alex, you had really set it up in that I thought it might actually be good! Glad to see you had an open, positive view going into it, gave it every chance, alas, it mustn't be very good and I don't have any motivation to see it myself.
ReplyDeleteI did go and watch the clips of Lindsay online though, because why not. Hahaha.
Thanks man! I set it up that way because I really did want it to be good. I had nothing but hopeful intentions, but sadly, those were squashed almost immediately.
DeleteI read that article you linked here and it's actually one of the more positives articles I read on this one, at least they had some good things to say about Lohan.
ReplyDeleteI'll probably see this soon, the story seems interesting but Ellis's ridiculous tweets really seem to indicate he has lost it completely so I'm not surprised he himself wanted Deen to star in the movie so bad.
A lot of people saw that Times article as bad, but I dunno, Schrader said it was mostly accurate, so there's that. I'd be interested to hear your take on this one, for sure.
DeleteFor what it's worth, I think Lindsay Lohan's best performance was in Georgia's Rule.. I can't help to like her in that.. I can't help to like the movie as well. I've never been Lohan's hater, I just hate her decisions in life which have downgraded her roles in Hollywood. Amongst the Disney chicks, she isn't a bad actress.. she just gets bad roles due to her real life persona.
ReplyDeleteAnd an answer to your question: “Oh, wow, where has this guy been?” - in porn, honey.. in porn. :D
Ha, I meant where has this very convincing creepy version of Christian been. Not Deen in general.
DeleteGlad you've never been a Lohan hater either. I don't agree with some of her life choices, but I've always rooted for her success. If nothing else, I hope The Canyons can somehow jump start her career. We'll see.