Patrick is the kind of role that we’ve seen all too often in
these types of films. He comes to Ruth’s home unannounced, just checking in. He
moves softly, and let’s his slow-brewing love for Ruth be known with a gentle
voice and kind gestures. It’s the whole
officer-getting-too-close-and-woman-falling-for-him bit, only handled with far
more maturity and restraint than we’ve come to expect.
Perhaps more accomplished than Lowery’s ability to confidently
retell an old tale is the way he tells it on the surface. Ain’t Them Bodies Saints has drawn many comparisons to the
aesthetic work of Terrence Malick, which is most certainly fair. With the help
of Bradford Young’s dark, gliding, patient cinematography and Daniel Hart’s
understated score, Lowery has crafted a film of melancholic moments. Plot, easily defined
though it may be, is not what motivates this film. It’s in the looks, the
sparse lines of dialogue, the way the sun silhouettes a woman longing for the
love she’s lost.
Since her brief turn in The
Social Network, Rooney Mara has quietly asserted herself as a powerhouse of
American cinema. Her work as Ruth only enhances that notion. This is her most
restrained performance to date, and it proves that she’s an actress who can do
as much with a little as she can with a lot. Likewise for Affleck, who we long
ago knew was capable of letting his face do the talking. Bob is the best work
he’s delivered since his one-two punch performances in The Assassination of Jesse James and Gone Baby Gone. The film rests on their shoulders, and they carry
it steadily to the end.
Lowery has said in a number of interviews that he is a man
less concerned with the final outcome, and more focused on how that outcome is
framed. That’s a perfect way to describe Ain’t
Them Bodies Saints. The movie clocks in at 96 minutes, but feels much
longer, due to its purposefully slow pace, and neglect of catharsis. As I
watched the film, I became inherently aware that it will struggle to find an
audience outside of die hard festival attendees and art house movie buffs.
Which is perfectly fine. In fact, that’s my way of saying that this film is
different, thankfully so. B+
I might see this film later this month (if it's playing nearby) as I've been hearing a lot of mixed reviews about this. Still, I want to see this.
ReplyDeleteMost of the reviews I've seen have been ecstatic. I wouldn't hail it as a masterpiece or anything, but it's definitely unique.
DeleteI'm looking forward to this one. Did you read the short graphic novel prologue that came out for this?
ReplyDeleteI didn't, no. But I heard about it. Might have to scope it out. Hope you dig the flick!
DeleteI'm dying to see this one. I'd love to see Affleck and Mara get some notice this awards season.
ReplyDeleteAhh I dunno... might be too small, if that makes sense. If Venice, Telluride and TIFF are any indication, we have a shitload of amazing flicks coming our way. This one might get lost in the fold.
DeleteYeah, I meant maybe the odd critics' nod, but I don't expect anything big for it.
DeleteIt could pull out an Indie Spirit nom or two. Definitely hope it does.
DeleteThis was a decent little flick. I wouldn't say it was anything extraordinary but the performances are solid and it looks fantastic. The score is also really well done as well, very evocative of the time when this is supposed to take place. It was a little too noodly(...) for my tastes but I guess I would say that I enjoyed it overall.
ReplyDeleteYep, in full agreement with you. Not much staying power to it either, in my opinion.
Delete