Pages

Friday, September 6, 2013

Ain’t Them Bodies Saints

The primary beauty of David Lowery’s new film, Ain’t Them Bodies Saints, is the way it manages to devise its story around such a familiar plot, but is executed in such a unique fashion. An outlaw is sent to prison, leaving his wife and child behind. Years later, he escapes and does everything in his power to find his family. That’s a plot description we’ve seen on screen dozens of times over. And shortly after the film began, I feared that I would be shown nothing new in the subsequent 90 minutes. How wrong could I be?

Once Bob (Casey Affleck) escapes from prison after serving years inside for shooting a cop (and other offenses), he makes his way back to his Texas town to reunite with his lover, Ruth (Rooney Mara) and the daughter he’s never met. Obstacles in Bob’s way include a man he used to work for (Keith Carradine) who likes Bob, but warns him to stay away from Ruth, who is now freed of Bob’s burdens. A handful of bounty hunters are tracking Bob, for reasons we’re never fully aware of. But, most importantly, Ruth has taken kindly to Patrick (Ben Foster), a local police officer who was part of the team that took Bob down.
Patrick is the kind of role that we’ve seen all too often in these types of films. He comes to Ruth’s home unannounced, just checking in. He moves softly, and let’s his slow-brewing love for Ruth be known with a gentle voice and kind gestures. It’s the whole officer-getting-too-close-and-woman-falling-for-him bit, only handled with far more maturity and restraint than we’ve come to expect.

Perhaps more accomplished than Lowery’s ability to confidently retell an old tale is the way he tells it on the surface. Ain’t Them Bodies Saints has drawn many comparisons to the aesthetic work of Terrence Malick, which is most certainly fair. With the help of Bradford Young’s dark, gliding, patient cinematography and Daniel Hart’s understated score, Lowery has crafted a film of melancholic moments. Plot, easily defined though it may be, is not what motivates this film. It’s in the looks, the sparse lines of dialogue, the way the sun silhouettes a woman longing for the love she’s lost.
Since her brief turn in The Social Network, Rooney Mara has quietly asserted herself as a powerhouse of American cinema. Her work as Ruth only enhances that notion. This is her most restrained performance to date, and it proves that she’s an actress who can do as much with a little as she can with a lot. Likewise for Affleck, who we long ago knew was capable of letting his face do the talking. Bob is the best work he’s delivered since his one-two punch performances in The Assassination of Jesse James and Gone Baby Gone. The film rests on their shoulders, and they carry it steadily to the end.

Lowery has said in a number of interviews that he is a man less concerned with the final outcome, and more focused on how that outcome is framed. That’s a perfect way to describe Ain’t Them Bodies Saints. The movie clocks in at 96 minutes, but feels much longer, due to its purposefully slow pace, and neglect of catharsis. As I watched the film, I became inherently aware that it will struggle to find an audience outside of die hard festival attendees and art house movie buffs. Which is perfectly fine. In fact, that’s my way of saying that this film is different, thankfully so. B+

10 comments:

  1. I might see this film later this month (if it's playing nearby) as I've been hearing a lot of mixed reviews about this. Still, I want to see this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Most of the reviews I've seen have been ecstatic. I wouldn't hail it as a masterpiece or anything, but it's definitely unique.

      Delete
  2. I'm looking forward to this one. Did you read the short graphic novel prologue that came out for this?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't, no. But I heard about it. Might have to scope it out. Hope you dig the flick!

      Delete
  3. I'm dying to see this one. I'd love to see Affleck and Mara get some notice this awards season.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ahh I dunno... might be too small, if that makes sense. If Venice, Telluride and TIFF are any indication, we have a shitload of amazing flicks coming our way. This one might get lost in the fold.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, I meant maybe the odd critics' nod, but I don't expect anything big for it.

      Delete
    3. It could pull out an Indie Spirit nom or two. Definitely hope it does.

      Delete
  4. This was a decent little flick. I wouldn't say it was anything extraordinary but the performances are solid and it looks fantastic. The score is also really well done as well, very evocative of the time when this is supposed to take place. It was a little too noodly(...) for my tastes but I guess I would say that I enjoyed it overall.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, in full agreement with you. Not much staying power to it either, in my opinion.

      Delete